Anti-Creationists and Reasoning from Errors
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiU8x4ad84I9JLquwV7p-2EuVPR7KkzKCqNiTCdavuowzquO5TtUajANcf0Yys-ZNfzXpbF_PZO2UUJay6W3xUDn84O50zAu3-Ipvz8GhtoVmSgF6PSZCVTqT3w11TPUp-2mc0f967jzn8/s1600/hildesheim-germany-673415_960_720.jpg)
Many questions about creation, the Genesis Flood, the Ark, and other topics are to be expected. They happened a long time ago, and the Bible doesn't give us as much detail as some of us m ay think we need. There are times that questions come to mind, often during a lecture or in a conversation. It's mighty helpful to learn about logical fallacies, especially when opponents of biblical creation use them so frequently. We get a heap of them at The Question Evolution Project, and bad reasoning from the Evo Sith is common fare on many creationary sites and social media. They get really agitated when we point out the fallacies, and some get furious when they are not allowed to continue building arguments on foundations based on faulty arguments or premises . (It's possible on rare occasions to have a valid conclusion from a bad argument, but that's not a product of skillful re asoning . ) Some go riding down a trail to prove something, and this is the fallacy of the ir