Sneaky Evolution Semantics

First, a warning. There are words in here that may trigger bots on social(ist) media, so people who quote them should d!sgvise them.

Concepts learned here are useful elsewhere, such as spotting logical fallacies. Another is how words can be manipulated. The word p0rnography was redefined by leftists to include the Bible. According to some people, I am a rac!st because I have less melanin than some folks, and it is acceptable to hate me — they redefined racism. Indeed, the word evolution itself is conflated so that small changes in organisms means Darwin was right.

Image by Cowboy Bob Sorensen of angelic visitation manifesting (I redefined "lens flare")

Redefining words to suit an agenda or public sentiment is often used to smuggle concepts into discussions and even public policy. A dry arroyo can be a "navigable river" for the sake of governmental control and generating money. How about non-avian dinosaurs? Those sidewinders are manipulating people into accepting the predominant view that birds evolved into dinosaurs. (Very sneaky, that one.) Darwin's disciples are full of such shenanigans.

Politicians are not alone in using disorienting and deceptive terminology. In fact, manipulating, mystifying mumbo-jumbo is a typical trick of the trade for evolutionists. Consider these perplexing, loaded terms with distorted definitionxs that distract more than inform.

That's all the excerpt you're getting from this short article. To read it all, see "When Is Dry Desert a Navigable River?"