Ten Million Reasons to Show Abiogenesis

No, abiogenesis — chemical evolution — has not, and cannot be scientifically demonstrated. Thanks for reading. Good day.

Okay, you want a mite more. People calculate astronomical odds against life coming from non-life, and it has been proven to be impossible, some atheists and other evolutionists still cling to that absurd hope. Dr. James Tour challenged secularists to answer some origin of life (OoL) questions. They did not answer. Also, there is a $10 million dollar prize waiting for someone to meet the standard and become comfortably well-off.

Taken from public domain images here and here, then heavily modified

The ID article featured below made grandiose claims about the importance of abiogenesis happening. However, even if it was demonstrated, it would only show that it was made possible in that prize-winning instance. Pull back the reins on that pony and slow down, Hoss!

Many questions would then be raised. Also, the same unethical secular science industry would be making pronouncements about molecules-to-mango evolution. They have done this in the past, and biblical creationists have shown that secularists are full of the stuff that gets put in fields to make plants grow. They need to cowboy up and admit that there is a Creator and neither chemical nor biological evolution gave us life.

When you get deep in the weeds of any theoretical debate, you sometimes seem to float off into an abstract world where any position can seem plausible or implausible depending on your prior commitments. And the debate can go on forever, because there is no impartial umpire to say which arguments really hold water and which don’t. 

So it can be useful, sometimes, to take a step back and look around for an outside rubric to measure the success or failure of a theory.

You may want to read the rest and see what you think. To do so, follow the link to "Origin of Life Challenge: $10 Million, Just Lying Around."