Logic Getting Worse in Evolutionism
As discussed here many times, believers in descent with modifications tend to use horrendous reasoning in their papers. (Lapdog popular science journalists often makes things worse.) Researchers are prone to offering an explanation with insufficient evidence for something observed but excluding other possibilities.
Not only do materialists get away with using bad logic in their presentations, the problem is getting worse. Nobody cares. Evolution doesn't care (study on those last three words and see what I just did). Consider how the Pauli Exclusion is used as a rescuing device for dinosaur soft tissues, which is...truly bizarre.
Evolution is a given, treated as a fact or even a law. They exclude Intelligent Design and especially biblical creation even though evidence support those explanations. If an organism exists, it must have evolved through atheistic materialism — which strikes this child as begging the question.
One recent example of fake science logic involves the coelacanth. This fish was an icon of evolution, thought to be an ancestor of land animals. They assumed that it used fins for walking on the ocean bottom. When it was found alive and well, Darwinists were disappointed to find that it did not do anything resembling walking. This and other items are discussed in the link below.
Before reading the following news headlines, remember that Darwinism is mindless, aimless, and impersonal. Nobody cares what happens. Nothing “evolves to” get better. Extinction is always the easiest way out of a struggle for existence, because, again, nobody cares. That is (and should be) the logic of Darwinism. But if logic evolved, it isn’t logical, is it? Indeed, it can’t be.
Read and be amazed by going to "Darwinism Degrades Logic." A follow-up article is also worth your time, "Science Media Abandons Empiricism." To be blunt, these people are purveyors of evoporn: It makes them feel good that they did something sciency, but does not advance actual science or reason.