Eliminating the Myth of the Peppered Moth

One of the main icons of evolutionism is the peppered moth, which is used in textbooks as a classic example of natural selection. The story is that the moths had two varieties, light and dark. Pollution darkened the tree trunks, the lighter moths became bird food and the darker ones survived. Hail Darwin! Blessed be!

The moth story is fake — and evolutionists know it. If Darwinism were true, why is there a need for trickery, bad science, confusion, fraud, and outright lies? New Nobel Prize-winning evidence further destroys the tale.

Light and dark varieties of peppered moths, Wikimedia Commons / Olaf Leillinger (link to top one is here, link to bottom is one here)

While DNA is frequently the star of a biological show, RNA is its very important partner. It has several vital functions and takes different forms. There is ribosomal RNA (rRNA), messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA).

A new surprise was found in the form of microRNAs. There are several types of this, and many work together. MicroRNA seems to respond to the environment. It's regulated, and practically shouts, "I'm designed! Deal with it, hippies!" The Creator gave yet another scientific difficulty for evolutionary speculations.

The discovery of microRNA switching networks opens new windows of research to understand how organisms can adapt quickly to signals from the environment without waiting for lucky mutations to occur. With this Nobel Prize-winning understanding of molecular switches, we can look at the topic of peppered moths with sharper lenses.

To read all of this scientifically startling article, see "Nobel Prize vs. the Peppered Myth."