This may Finally put the Big Bang Down

Posted by -

The Big Bang story has been built, rebuilt, cobbled, and Frankensteined in general. When told by card-carrying members of the secular science industry, it sounds tidy and almost plausible. It brought on both cosmic and biological evolution. Looks good on paper.

However, the tale is told as if scientists were trucking along in complete unity. Nope. Cosmologists and cosmogonists in the ranks disagree. It is also presented without any actual science, driven by presuppositions and mathematics that support them. The cosmological constant problem may be a good reason to put the thing down.

Made at photofunny with a NASA / ESA image (usage does not imply endorsement of site contents)
Something that supports science itself is how scientific laws (as we understand them) are consistent and predictable, which fits both Intelligent Design and biblical creation science views. A scientist made a claim that is...truly bizarre: The fundamental principle called the cosmological constant — isn't.

That is, it may work (or did work) differently in various places around the universe. No science to see here, folks, move along. When secularists try so desperately to deny evidence for creation by using the complex scientific principle of Making Things Up™, I get a warm, tingly feeling in my pineal gland. Anyone else?
Big Bang cosmology is widely taught as the explanation for the origin of the universe. For example, in the introduction to an astronomy book for young readers published ten years ago in 2014, the claim was made that readers can “learn about the Big Bang that started it all, and the Big Crunch that may end it all.” After noting that the “Universe is everything that exists, from the tiniest bit of an atom to entire galaxies”, under the heading ‘The Big Bang’, the author explains that . . . .

Many cosmological constants exist. The cosmological constant problem in this case refers to the substantial disagreement between the observed values of vacuum energy density (the small value of the cosmological constant) and the much larger value predicted by quantum field theory.

To read the article in its entirety, head on over to "How Big Bang Cosmology Might Die." Another serious threat to the Big Bang is Dr. Jason Lisle's idea based on data from the JWST. For that, see "Big Bang Demise and the Doppler Model."