Evolutionists Assume Age of Mammoth DNA

While on a ride during a nice evening, I met Rusty Swingset, foreman at the Darwin Ranch and his lady friend Jacqueline Hyde. The three of us reined in and exchanged pleasantries. Jacqueline brought up the subject of extremely well-preserved DNA that was discovered in a woolly mammoth.

Rusty warmed to the subject and told of the report where conditions in a cave contributed to the preservation, and the mammoth meat was like a soft jerky. It was essentially freeze-dried, so it lasted tens of thousands of years. Even chromosomes were intact.

Mammoths image, Flickr / Andrew Wilkinson (CC BY-SA 2.0)

While this is not on the scale of dinosaur soft tissues and DNA allegedly lasting sixty-five million years, the fact remains that it is fragile even in the best of conditions. Sitting around after all those years would still cause it to degrade.

Once again, researchers are ignoring important facts while assuming the age is correct. (Darwin needs great amounts of time his wonders to perform — and secularists strive to create it for him.) Further, they are assuming their deep-time dating methods are correct. In reality, the evidence points to a much shorter time frame and recent creation.

You can read the article that prompted this here write up by riding over to "Mammoth DNA Challenges Assumed Age."