Evolutionary Psychologists Refute Themselves

Knowledgeable biblical apologists understand several things about worldviews, including how they must be internally consistent. Atheists and evolutionists frequently ignore logic while pretending that science and reason support their beliefs. That is a characteristic of an inconsistent worldview.

Another indication of a faulty belief system is the reliance on arbitrary assertions. So is circular reasoning, such as assuming evolution in order to prove an instance of evolution. Changing or assigning new meanings to words and phrases also indicates a weak worldview. A couple of evolutionary psychologists presented irrational material about consciousness.

Brain and consciousness, Pixabay / Gerd Altmann (Geralt)

Like others involved in the secular science industry, psychologists presuppose atoms-to-atheist evolution and build from there; they do not question whether or not evolution happened in the first place. In this instance, two psychologists suggest consciousness may have evolved not for the sake of individuals, but for society.

I reckon that teleology (purpose in evolution) is allowed in this case because reasons and stuff. And yet, materialists tend to deny the existence of consciousness or the soul. The truth is that we have souls, consciousness, consciences, logic (which is not material), and more. This is because we are created in the image of God. Cowboy up and deal with it.

Once you watch a Darwinist proposition implode, you never forget it. But you have to watch from outside evolutionary fogma to witness the collapse. From inside the fogma, everything looks rational and consistent all the way down to the singularity. Here is a classic illustration found at a quasi-“science” site, The Conversation, where various scientists share their findings and opinions for a lay audience.

I suggest that you keep reading and get a lesson in logic, plus see how the psychologists are refuted. To do so, visit "Evolutionary Psychology Refutes Itself."