Sanitizing Darwin's Racist History Again
Sometimes when creationists bring up Charles Darwin's racism, it puts burrs under the saddles of his followers. They claim it is an ad homiem and a distraction, but the fact remains despite their protestations. It has also been extensively documented. His racism is extremely relevant, as it is entrenched in his evolutionary conjectures. We saw how a couple of his biographers falsely tried to say that his theory had a noble motive, the abolition of slavery. Professor Joseph L. Graves, Jr. is up to something similar.
Celebration of Abolition of Slavery...in 1866 via NYPL, colorized at Palette, then modified at PhotoFunia |
Why do they do it? Why do scholars committed to evolution seek to edit and massage Darwin into something he wasn’t, in particular on the issue of race? . . .
Now along comes Professor Joseph L. Graves Jr., “the first African American to receive a PhD in evolutionary biology,” according to his publisher, who was “once styled as the ‘Black Darwin.’” (He once was styled that but no longer is? Why not?) His new book is A Voice in the Wilderness: A Pioneering Biologist Explains How Evolution Can Help Us Solve Our Biggest Problems. In Dr. Graves’s treatment, which “rewrite[s] his field,” evolution solves our biggest problems with a politically progressive program that “decimates homophobia, sexism, and classism,” elucidated in “a powerful work of scientific anti-racism.”
To read it all, see "Yet Another Scholar Seeks to Airbrush Darwin’s Racist Legacy." Closely related is "Joseph L. Graves as the 'Black Darwin'? Think Again."