Charles Darwin was not a Slavery Abolitionist
Disciples of Charles Darwin try to brush aside or ignore his view of women as inferior, and especially his blatant racism. Some build a straw man by claiming that we said evolution is racist when we talk about scientific racism and other extensions of his conjectures.
There have been owlhoots who claim that saying Darwin was a racist is an ad hominem, but that conveniently ignores the fact that his beliefs were fundamental in his development of evolution — ideas have consequences. People also point out that he was opposed to slavery, and a couple of authors try to make Charlie appear to be a passionate abolitionist.
Public domain image, run through removebg, colorized at Palette, flames added at LunaPic |
- “Sacred Cause”? Reconsidering Charles Darwin as Abolitionist
- Fact Check: Imagining Darwin’s Abolitionism
- Darwin and Agassiz: An Imaginary Picture
- Darwin and the “Eyre Affair”: A Speculative Tale
- A Failed Attempt to Turn Darwin into Wilberforce