Evolutionists Ruining Human Evolution
Although it has been stated before, it needs to be repeated: Believers is particles-to-painter evolution believe that after man evolved, he was just a stupid brute. A secular miracle occurred that gradually gave humans intelligence but left apes incapable of rational thought.
Because of their evolutionary and deep-time presuppositions, evolutionists are continually surprised at the brilliance of early man. It keeps happening "earlier than thought." (If y'all get a chance, watch some of the mini-series Ancient Top Ten on the History Channel. People did some amazing stuff long, long ago.) So-called primitive people showed abstract thought, something else that sets us apart from apes.
Bison painting, Cave of Altamira, WikiComm / Cave of Altamira and Paleolithic Cave Art of Northern Spain (CC BY-SA 3.0) |
Michael Marshall has been a science writer for years, writing regularly for New Scientist, the BBC and other mainstream science news organizations. One of his newest stories introduces a new ‘law of nature’ he discovered. The occasion was new dates for cave art that challenge longstanding views about human evolution.
In his New Scientist article from July 15, “When did humans start making art and were Neanderthals artists too?”, Marshall reasons that certain recently discovered cave art in Spain is far too early—assuming the standard evolutionary timeline—to have been made by “modern humans,” so it must have been created by Neanderthals. The artwork clearly shows representations of animals along with dots and geometric figures that indicate abstract thought.
You would do well to read the rest of the article at "Human Evolution Under Marshall Law." See what he did with the title?