Evolution Negates Science

Many promoters of scum-to-skeptic evolution have used the effete claim that evolution is essential for science. Informed Christians often respond that there is no evidence of evolution being even remotely important for the advancement of science and technology. Digging deeper, we also tell them that most of modern science is based on biblical thinking, and that the founders were often Bible believers. Atheists find this upsetting, and try to deny the facts. It's their nature, and what they do.

Something that really annoys these owlhoots is when the basis of science itself is examined. To do science, consistency and uniformity in nature are required. For example, the cow doesn't jump over the moon. Another obvious example is that our sun is well-mannered, and does not fry us one day and freeze us the next. Scientists need to rely on uniformity. 

This consistency is all a validation of principles found in the Bible, and the Christian worldview makes science possible. No, obviously people who deny God still perform science, but that does not negate the truth. The evolutionist provide a logical basis for uniformity — and for science itself. Otherwise, how can anyone trust minds, thoughts, that are the basis of chemical accidents, as evolutionists maintain?

Some evolutionists have argued that science isn’t possible without evolution. They teach that science and technology actually require the principles of molecules-to-man evolution in order to work. They claim that those who hold to a biblical creation worldview are in danger of not being able to understand science!

Critical thinkers will realize that these kinds of arguments are quite ironic because evolution is actually contrary to the principles of science. That is, if evolution were true, the concept of science would not make sense. Science actually requires a biblical creation framework in order to be possible. Here’s why:

To read the rest, click on "Evolution: The Anti-Science".